p84

Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 |
Kevin52
RE: marathon time 9/24/2011 12:44PM - in reply to Predicted time answerReply | Return to Index | Report Post

Predicted time answer wrote:

86-87 secs should be good for a 2:49 marathon time +/- a couple mins either way.


What about if you cut across the infield of the track?

As long as you show up at the end of each lap in 86-87 you're good to go... right?
Junk Master
RE: marathon time 9/24/2011 5:00PM - in reply to Kevin52Reply | Return to Index | Report Post
There's more to this than an article. I'm thinking cable series. Or at least a MOW.
Jimboo
RE: marathon time 9/24/2011 6:57PM - in reply to Junk MasterReply | Return to Index | Report Post
I also had a weird feeling that Clarkston Kent was Kip too. I felt like he was just trying to delay it everytime someone tried to bump it. I read all 80 pages two months ago and have periodically checked the thread to see if any new information has come up. I feel like were still missing a couple different pieces to this story. I have a friend running Chicago, so i'll make sure he's on the lookout for the Kipster.
hrunner
RE: marathon time 9/24/2011 11:03PM - in reply to JimbooReply | Return to Index | Report Post
Funny, that sounded ridiculous the first time I heard it. But the guy did 'fake' a marathon - why wouldn't he come on here and try anything he could to keep from being uncovered?
quote]Jimboo wrote:

I also had a weird feeling that Clarkston Kent was Kip too. I felt like he was just trying to delay it everytime someone tried to bump it. I read all 80 pages two months ago and have periodically checked the thread to see if any new information has come up. I feel like were still missing a couple different pieces to this story. I have a friend running Chicago, so i'll make sure he's on the lookout for the Kipster.[/quote]
Junk Master
RE: marathon time 9/24/2011 11:37PM - in reply to hrunnerReply | Return to Index | Report Post
Clarkston Kent IS Kip.

Yet another example of Kip's evil genius. He comes on here claiming to be writing an article that will expose Kip...just to stall any future exposure.
runerrre
RE: marathon time 9/25/2011 1:23AM - in reply to Junk MasterReply | Return to Index | Report Post
I agree -- we have been had!
This guy is a smart dude!
His plan worked -- defer the whole thing and it will lose interest.
GaryB
RE: marathon time 9/25/2011 6:20AM - in reply to runerrreReply | Return to Index | Report Post
Clarkston Kent is NOT Kip.
the smartest letsrunner
RE: marathon time 9/25/2011 8:05AM - in reply to Predicted time answerReply | Return to Index | Report Post

Predicted time answer wrote:

86-87 secs should be good for a 2:49 marathon time +/- a couple mins either way.


What?? All you know is someone was doing 5:10 miles. You have no idea of the rest, or whether he was doing 4x1 or 12x1. And you say that's "good for" a 2:49 marathon? Please say you've never actually run before.
Predicted time answer
for smart guy 9/25/2011 8:48AM - in reply to the smartest letsrunnerReply | Return to Index | Report Post
Correction- not 5:10 miles but rather 86 x 4 = 5:44 miles. This assumes the standard 4 +/- x 1 miles. The guys in the A group at my track all run mile repeats between 5:30-5:45 and all have marathon times 2:44-2:50. Obviously the more repeats the better the time. As much as I hate to say it, Kippy's lap times means he's in the ballpark of a 2:49.
me two
RE: for smart guy 9/25/2011 9:24AM - in reply to Predicted time answerReply | Return to Index | Report Post

Predicted time answer wrote:

Correction- not 5:10 miles but rather 86 x 4 = 5:44 miles. This assumes the standard 4 +/- x 1 miles. The guys in the A group at my track all run mile repeats between 5:30-5:45 and all have marathon times 2:44-2:50. Obviously the more repeats the better the time. As much as I hate to say it, Kippy's lap times means he's in the ballpark of a 2:49.


Right. Because everybody knows that 3 or 4 x 1 mile (probably at 5k pace) is a great indicator workout for marathon fitness.

Especially for a person that's proven themselves such a mental case that they can't even complete the full 26.2 distance without finding a way to cut the course short.
Fell Runner
RE: marathon time 9/25/2011 10:00AM - in reply to GaryBReply | Return to Index | Report Post

GaryB wrote:

Clarkston Kent is NOT Kip.


Prove it. For instance I've never seen them both in the same photo.
Predicted time answer
RE: for smart guy 9/25/2011 10:15AM - in reply to me twoReply | Return to Index | Report Post
It was a generalization. You can take the names out of it. If John Doe does these workouts and other standard marathon training, then he will likely run a sub 2:50 marathon time on a fair course.
Race detective
RE: Rojo says he might start a Kip Litton thread but 1 and only 1 thread 9/25/2011 10:50AM - in reply to Junk MasterReply | Return to Index | Report Post

Junk Master wrote:

Clarkston Kent IS Kip.

Yet another example of Kip's evil genius. He comes on here claiming to be writing an article that will expose Kip...just to stall any future exposure.


Glad that GaryB already chimed in on this. I don't know CK personally, but his responses on this thread have shown such a consistency of being the most determined person to put a stop to KL's shenanigans, that this conjecture has no merits whatsoever. CK was the one who got Kip to take down his "WorldRecord Run" website after evidence of Kip's race cheating became clear. CK wrote to reporters in Wyoming to get corroboration that the "West Wyoming Marathon" was totally fabricated. The list goes on.

Accusations of this type and defense of CK already appeared on this thread. See p. 57.

CK has obviously invested a lot of effort into this. Yes, it seems to be taking a long time to get an article out, but I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt regarding any reasons for delay. CK is probably doing all of this in his spare time and we should be thankful that he has taken on this effort.
this is a long thread
RE: Rojo says he might start a Kip Litton thread but 1 and only 1 thread 9/25/2011 10:54AM - in reply to Race detectiveReply | Return to Index | Report Post
Rumour of the day:

Race detective is Kip Litton.
GaryB
RE: Rojo says he might start a Kip Litton thread but 1 and only 1 thread 9/25/2011 11:05AM - in reply to Race detectiveReply | Return to Index | Report Post
Well I know CK personally. He is not the guy who cheated me out of an award at last years Thunder Roads marathon.
Clarkston Kent
RE: Rojo says he might start a Kip Litton thread but only 1 and only 1 thread 9/25/2011 12:03PM - in reply to the geckoReply | Return to Index | Report Post

the gecko wrote:

[quote]dd wrote:

I have to agree. Clarkson Kent, I was looking forward to seeing this story in a "major running publication" that you kept hinting at with your "patience grasshopper" bit, but now this delaying the supposed story because of his "coy behavior" is starting to sound, well, kip-like. If you have a compelling story with facts, reliable accounts from others, etc, go with it. You can say you offered him a chance to respond, and he declined. You have no obligation to wait for him. I hope to be wrong, and see this saga laid out in print, but at this point I'm guessing it won't happen. I can't recall what kind of writer you said/implied you were, but the journalists I know don't sit on a story like this (or any story) for the better part of a year.


Agree wholeheartedly with this. People have been more than patient with the process, and Clarkston Kent. Why in the world would anybody delay a story like this because the subject is playing "coy". All that deserves is a line at the end of the article to the effect of "Mr. Litton did not return numerous calls and emails asking for an interview/comment" Done.

Sadly, our media is truly becoming a joke.[/quote]

While I can appreciate the eagerness/impatience of so many that want the story to appear yesterday, this one will take as much time as needed. Kip knows the seriousness of the impending story - both that it'll make him look very, very bad and the size/nature of the audience that'll see it. This has to make him feel very uneasy AND this is why he's resistant to a personal interview.

Not to fear, the details of the story are many and lined up, waiting & hoping to be tied up soon. I don't need folks to ask me to 'put up or shut up' - I don't owe this board a thing. Offering suggestions on how to wrap up the story are fine but concluding w/'our media is truly becoming a joke' is not the case here.

I am not Kip. I've never met or personally spoken w/him. Hang loose, I'm confident the wait will be worth it.
Clarkston_Kent
RE: Rojo says he might start a Kip Litton thread but only 1 and only 1 thread 9/25/2011 12:32PM - in reply to Clarkston KentReply | Return to Index | Report Post
Here is all the proof you need- If I were Kip I never would have portrayed myself here as a pompous know-it-all begging for credit for allegedly removing the website and solving the WY race.
Fell Runner
RE: Rojo says he might start a Kip Litton thread but only 1 and only 1 thread 9/25/2011 12:33PM - in reply to Clarkston KentReply | Return to Index | Report Post
I've been talking to some 9/11 "truthers" and apparently everyone in this thread other than me is Kip and I'm beginning to doubt myself
Run a lot more
Perfect interview 9/25/2011 12:41PM - in reply to Fell RunnerReply | Return to Index | Report Post
If you want a good interview, grab your recorder and just stick your mic in his face right after his kid's funeral. He won't be able to squirm out of it. Problem solved.
Kevin52
RE: marathon time 9/25/2011 1:22PM - in reply to GaryBReply | Return to Index | Report Post

GaryB wrote:

Clarkston Kent is NOT Kip.


This is correct.

While I have never officially met CK, I know who he is and have seen him at many local races. He has been consistently involved in the local running scene.

By contrast Kip rarely runs the small local races in the last few years - likely about the time the cheating started.
Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 |


Read more: http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=3863010&page=83#ixzz1ZETVN4zB
Buy your shoes from LetsRun and save 20% everday http://www.letsrun.com/save